View Full Version : nat vs bridge firewall ?
hkgonra
11-18-2008, 05:01 PM
I am currently running a sonicwall and need untangle to be able to handle this configuration.
http://info.bluezonesoftware.com/docs/html/draw2.htm
Basicly my server has to have a public ip address in it's nic and the firewall needs to be able to handle me telling it that these ip's are in the DMZ.
dmorris
11-18-2008, 06:01 PM
welcome to the forums!
I'm not sure what you mean.
Untangle installs inline (the pic makes it looks like you're looking for some out-of-line solution?)
If you are looking for an inline solution you can easily do this with a transparent bridge - just give untangle a public IP right next to your DMZ servers and it will bridge whatever is in its subnet...
hkgonra
11-18-2008, 07:25 PM
I want untangle to be my firewall.
Most open source firewalls that I have used have to have private ip ranges for the dmz , does untangle have this same limitation ?
Setup would be
24.xx.xx.58 wan ip ( public ip for all traffic from lan )
24.xx.xx.59 server on the dmz
You can use the DMZ with public addresses if the DMZ interface is bridged to the external, or with private addresses if it will function as a second internal subnet.
hkgonra
11-18-2008, 07:41 PM
thanks , looks like time for me to give it a try.