NAT IPsec VPN

[joe435]

Is it possible to connect a asa 5505 with an untangle and have this senario?

Our internal ip address of 192.168.0.x.
VPN terminated to 192.168.231.x.
Our client needs access to the server 192.168.0.13. Hopefully this all makes sense. I have herd this called nat transversal/translation, but am not entirely sure.

Thanks in advance.

John

[dmorris]

That just sounds like setting up a normal VPN. NAT traversal is for when you are setting up a VPN behind a NAT device.

I have no idea if that answers your question or not.

Nothing about what you stated sounds like an abnormal use case though.

[aboyce]

that could be it and or could it be this:
remote client needs access to 192.168.0.13 but his network already has a 192.168.0.0/24 subnet or connection to another existing VPN to that subnet. so you provide a nat or one to one nat to the 192.168.0.13 from say 192.168.231.13 so he can access it as the 192.168.231.13 which forwards to the internal address 192.168.0.13 and he gets to the server without conflicting addresses.

we do this all the time with VPN's using sonicwalls and cisco devices. would love to know if this can be done with UT.