This issue is what brought me to the forums. The re-router technology sounds like a good fit to many networks I manage. These networks generally have one server for domain and exchange services and a second server providing file services, Sharepoint services and Searchserver services. These are relatively small networks (under 25 users) at research facilities (quite a few sites). The current servers are dual Xeon with 4gb ram, 32-bit OS. The second server (file server) generally has low CPU utilization and plenty of available resources. It would seem that the rerouter technology would be a good fit and would allow us to eliminate a bunch of old Sonicwall appliances with expiring subscriptions.
Supporting the re-router technology on Windows Server OS's would seem to me to be very practical - especially given the move toward quad-core and dual quad-core processors in servers and the move toward server consolidation through virtualization.
Any insight on this issue will be greatly appreciated![]()