https://forums.untangle.com/intrusio...ec-2020-a.html
Looking at that thread and the year or so it's been, Debian has 6.0.1 of Suricata in the stable track now.
Any chance we can get it updated for the next release?
https://forums.untangle.com/intrusio...ec-2020-a.html
Looking at that thread and the year or so it's been, Debian has 6.0.1 of Suricata in the stable track now.
Any chance we can get it updated for the next release?
Suricata engine is based on the package available on the Debian platform. Debian package suricata 1:4.1.2-2+deb10u1 is the latest for Buster which 16.5.0 is based on. Debian Bullseye package suricata (1:6.0.1-3) will be in the next release.
Attention: Support and help on the Untangle Forums is provided by
volunteers and community members like yourself.
If you need Untangle support please call or email support@untangle.com
And yet, most sane people using Debian 10 have long since started using buster-backports, which has 1:6.0.1-2~bpo10+1.
Sadly, this is normal behavior for Untangle, which never uses backports. The upside is more stability, the downside is missing security updates sometimes. But yes this will also go away with the OS upgrade, which presumably is v17.0? I don't know for certain but given the above and other communications from Untangle seems likely.
Last edited by sky-knight; 02-23-2022 at 06:39 AM.
Rob Sandling, BS:SWE, MCP
NexgenAppliances.com
Phone: 866-794-8879 x201
Email: support@nexgenappliances.com
Rob Sandling, BS:SWE, MCP
NexgenAppliances.com
Phone: 866-794-8879 x201
Email: support@nexgenappliances.com
Even if 17 uses the current bullseye package suricata (1:6.0.1-3) it will be older than the backports version suricata (1:6.0.4-2~bpo11+1). I realize things need to be tested but there is also a need to be current. Debian is conservative enough without adding much more latency to it.
This applies to many packages not just this one. Using the logic that older packages are more secure fails more often than it works!