Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Untangle Ninja
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    1,135

    Default

    Cool.

  2. #12
    Master Untangler TirsoJRP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    466

    Default

    1. IPsec Speed Improvements:
    2. Default Gateway Group:
    3. Limiter AQM/Queue Schedulers:
    4. AutoConfigBackup is free!:
    5. DNS over TLS:
    6. Not to mention ipv6:


    Some products can innovate faster as they are targeted at a different markets. Also, pfsense is a firewall/router and has many tools while Untangle is an UTM.

    It all depends on your needs and capabilities.

    WebFiltering on UT is top tier while pfsense needs packages and url/ip lists to handle such function.

  3. #13
    Master Untangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    116

    Default

    What I'm more worried about is Untangle lagging behind when it comes to security technologies like IPS and Cloud.

    Untangle is also lagging badly behind on GUI. I currently have a CheckPoint appliance here for testing and the interface is just so much better and user friendlier. All the threats are clearly brought out. It's really easy to do contextual analysis and see what happened where. Untangle IPS looks really bad compared to this with cryptic Snort rule names, no contextual analysis and no actual information of what happened.

  4. #14
    Untangle Ninja f1assistance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Holly Springs, NC
    Posts
    1,495

    Default

    Don't forget the weakest link continues to circumvent even the best proactive/reactive defenses to date...and I fear will continue to do so far into the future. Layers and KISS are proven best!
    Vanguard Untangle...because nothing's worse than doing nothing!
    -------
    2, Pentium (R) Dual-Core CPU E5300 @ 2.60GHz 2599.968, 2089.96MB RAM
    And building #7 didn't kill itself!

  5. #15
    Master Untangler
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Brisbane AU
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Decisions about edge protection and traffic control essentially come down to two factors; can do the job and cost, and then once deployed they just sit in a rack for years.

    Is it providing protection? Is it cost effective? Boom.

    Ease of setting up is another thing entirely and a problem for the network/security guy. Other than us nerds, no one cares about point to point feature comparison.
    bluechris likes this.

  6. #16
    ljr
    ljr is offline
    Newbie ljr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I am mourning the IPv6 functionality that I had with my simple Asus router - which was really underpowered for the amount and type of data on my home network. However, none of the other UTM products offer IPv6 prefix delegation in a truly seamless way (I'm looking at you, Sophos, you're close) and none support DNS over TLS / DNS over HTTPS.

    I need DHCPv6 with prefix delegation, and I'm confident that is on the to-do list. Also, in favor of Untangle is the use of Debian upstream. Debian has unparalleled hardware support, thanks to the 4.x.x kernel branch, which is one major version above most if not all other UTMs (3.x.x).

    pfSense / OPNsense are great for what they're worth (free), but do not have nearly the same level of hardware support without excessive troubleshooting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2