Search:

yep as I expected no change in the status quo with no paid support.

still no word back on that free support ticket? I take it.

to fix this problem.

dns like pptp changed in version 10 have you went back to ver 9 of untangle and tried it?

question..

are you using open dns servers instead of att dns servers? if so that is where the email came from probably..

most isp do not mind but att does care if you use other dns servers...

i see no one has posted a fix for this problem yet other than contact support free or paid is that the only solution I take it? contact support?

wow got some screen shots with that advice man..
face it they broke the the dam thing version 10 and we must pay for support conctract if we want it to ever work again.

and for use free...

I have tried rebooting did not affect the problem of only one pptp connection out though..

I would just disable the router portion and just use the wireless portion.

normally go in and disable dhcp on the wireless router then just plug it in to a switch port on the lan.

good luck..

fqdn name will aways work first before NetBIOS name with out wins will not work. I take it you still have some windows xp and win2003 server in there some where..

cause in the dns name resolver.....

the reason I ask is I think those phones or in your case a singe phone from home need a public ip that is not untangled..so get another ip from your isp for the single phone to call home with at the...

Try the DMZ first are you getting a public IP address at home or a NAT IP address from your ISP?

Both the PC and the untangle router reboot will clear that out if you have your mac address correct for the device you are wanting to hand out a static DHCP address for.

I would normally reboot...

Could setup another DHCP server and turn DHCP off on the untangle server..
set the new DHCP server to give out the DNS server of your ISP

See if that fixes it.

Sounds like it might be DNS...

I have seen some crazy bios fixes or breaks stuff good job on diagnosing that one.

Maybe bridge traffic problem? There is no layer 2 bridge traffic from PC side to the where the cameras are connected..

The cam software for the cams might need to be plugged into the same segment...

I have noticed this on version 10 just about any change will bring down the network service.

The bypass traffic does not seem as effected.
I think under the old version DHCP was not under the...

The only spot I see for the bypass rule is that one place for 1723 port like in the rule I posted
a screen shot of.

The problem of letting more than one PPTP connection out is still there with...

this is what I take it your are talking about bypass rule.

5665

any word on those screens shots of this bypass rule that fixes the only allowing one vpn connection out at a time.



thanks

have any screen shots of that bypass rule you are talking about?

several post have tried that method and still can not get more than one vpn connection out to a pptp server at a time.

thanks

any one ever figure out why ut 10 is only allowing 1 vpn connection out at time?

any one ever figure out why we can not get more than one pptp connection out of untangle 10 at a time?

thought I would bump this up to the top so the other users having problem with v10 and letting pptp pass to a windows server to work.

it took 2 rules instead of one rule..

but found another...

I am not sure at this point if I want to put untangle 10 in front of a 500 node network at my office or not.

I think at this point with paid support or the free support it hard to test the free...

yes I had the same problem. I had to put in 2 separate rules to get it to allow pptp in from the out side connection one was forward simple rule for 1723. then a second rule with just the gre in it. ...